Hey guys. This topic is a hard one for me, as i fall right in the middle. I believe, as geek does, that if there is no way to prove they weren't acting on their own accord, they should be prosecuted. However, if they can prove beyond a doubt that they weren't in control of themselves when they committed the crime, they should be pardoned. I also believe that it should be different depending on the crime. I would be more inclined to give someone a reduced sentence on theft than on murder for example. I fully believe that it depends on the situation.
-Eli
No comments:
Post a Comment